AMA CPT® Assistant - 1996 Issue 2 (February)
CPT 1996 Erratum (February 1996)
February 1996 page 5 Coding Commentary CPT 1996 Erratum The parenthetical notation below, found on page 313 of CPT 1996 , should not have appeared. (For MAST, see 86005) CPT 1996 Erratum. CPT® Assistant. 1996; February 1996 page 5 ...
Subscribe or sign in to view the full article.
Article Overview
This short coding commentary records a February 1996 correction related to CPT 1996. It is relevant to coders and billing staff who need to track official errata and understand when a printed reference in the source material should be disregarded. The article is limited to a small editorial correction and does not present broader coding guidance.
Why This Topic Matters
Errata notices help ensure that coding references align with the official source material and that outdated or incorrect printed notes are not carried forward in documentation workflows.
Article Sections
-
February 1996 page 5
A short coding commentary notice identifying a correction associated with CPT 1996 and the referenced page in the source publication.
What You Will Learn
- How to recognize a published CPT erratum notice.
- Why official corrections to source references matter in coding reference work.
- How brief editorial notices are presented in CPT Assistant.
Who Should Read This
- Medical coders
- Billing staff
- Compliance personnel
- Coding educators
Codes Discussed
Subscribe or sign in to view the full article.


Quick, Current, Complete - www.findacode.com