AMA CPT® Assistant - 2004 Issue 5 (May)
Integumentary System/Surgery (May 2004)
May 2004 page 14 Coding Consultation:Questions and Answers Integumentary System, 17310 (Q&A) Question Can code 17310 be reported more than once for each specimen examined beyond the first five specimens? AMA Comment In CPT 2003, code 17310 was changed to an add-on code and the descriptor revised to clarify that this code is reported once for each additional specimen excised, prepared, and examined beyond the first five specimens reported with codes 17304-17307. This revision provides consistency with the descriptor language currently found in other surgical pathology code descriptors, with each additional specimen reported separately to reflect the additional...
Subscribe or sign in to view the full article.
Article Overview
This CPT Assistant article presents a coding consultation relevant to integumentary system surgery and surgical pathology reporting. It is aimed at coders, billers, and other revenue cycle professionals who work with surgical procedures and specimen-based reporting. The article explains the general context of a question-and-answer guidance piece and discusses how the topic relates to specimen counting and staged procedure reporting.
Why This Topic Matters
Understanding this guidance helps coding staff interpret how specimen-based reporting was being clarified in CPT Assistant for surgical pathology-related services. It is relevant to accurate CPT reporting and to recognizing the distinctions between primary and additional specimen reporting in a staged Mohs context.
Article Sections
-
Coding Consultation: Questions and Answers
A question-and-answer discussion about reporting in the integumentary surgery setting. The section focuses on specimen-based coding guidance and an AMA response tied to Mohs-related pathology reporting.
What You Will Learn
- The article’s scope within CPT Assistant coding consultation content
- How the discussion relates to integumentary system surgery reporting
- The general topic of specimen-based reporting in a staged procedure context
- The type of coding clarification addressed by the AMA comment
Who Should Read This
- Medical coders
- Coding auditors
- Billing staff
- Revenue cycle professionals
- Compliance staff
Codes Discussed
Code Ranges Discussed
Subscribe or sign in to view the full article.


Quick, Current, Complete - www.findacode.com