AMA Clinical Examples in Radiology - 2020 Issue 3 (Summer)
Multiple-Gated Acquisition Scan
CLINICAL EXAMPLE 1 Multiple-Gated Acquisition Scan CLINICAL HISTORY A 58-year-old female with left breast cancer. Baseline evaluation prior to chemotherapy. PROCEDURE Nuclear medicine multiple-gated acquisition (MUGA) scan TECHNIQUE The study was performed with 24.1 mCi of Tc-99m labeled autologous red blood cells (RBCs). Multigated images were acquired in the anterior and left anterior oblique short-axis projections. Quantitation was performed including left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF). COMPARISON None FINDINGS Left ventricular (LV) wall motion: No focal or diffuse abnormality. LVEF: 66%. IMPRESSION Normal size and function of the left ventricle; LVEF = 66%. HOW TO CODE 78472 Cardiac blood...
Subscribe or sign in to view the full article.
Article Overview
This article explains a nuclear medicine cardiac MUGA scan through a clinical example and associated coding discussion. It is aimed at coders, billers, and clinicians who need to understand the general reporting framework for the study, the separate reporting of radiopharmaceuticals, and the source references supporting the guidance. The article also notes related imaging variations and broader clinical uses of the exam.
Why This Topic Matters
Correct reporting for nuclear medicine cardiac imaging can affect claim accuracy, charge capture, and documentation consistency. The article helps readers identify the relevant code sets and understand the scope of the supporting guidance without relying on the full premium text.
Article Sections
-
Clinical Example 1
A sample patient scenario and imaging report are presented to frame the coding discussion. The section provides the clinical context for the nuclear medicine cardiac study.
-
How to Code
This section presents the related coding framework and discusses the reporting of the study and associated radiopharmaceutical information. It also references the diagnosis assignment used in the example.
-
Discussion
The discussion summarizes the exam type, mentions related imaging approaches, and describes broader clinical applications of the study. It also includes general reimbursement and reporting context for radiopharmaceuticals.
-
Coding Tip
A short tip section highlights general billing and reporting considerations for nuclear medicine procedures. It provides supplemental context for charge capture and related service components.
-
Sources
The sources section lists professional society and coding references used to support the article. It identifies the guidance documents and codebook editions consulted for the example.
What You Will Learn
- How the article frames a nuclear medicine cardiac imaging example
- Which major code sets are involved in the reporting discussion
- How the article treats separate reporting of the radiopharmaceutical
- What general sources and practice references support the guidance
- How the article situates the exam within broader clinical and reimbursement context
Who Should Read This
- Medical coders
- Coding educators
- Radiology billing staff
- Nuclear medicine professionals
- Compliance and reimbursement teams
Codes Discussed
Subscribe or sign in to view the full article.



Quick, Current, Complete - www.findacode.com