AMA CPT® Assistant - 2017 Issue 3 (March)
Radiology: Diagnostic Radiology (Diagnostic Imaging) (Q&A) (March 2017)
March 2017 page 11 Radiology: Diagnostic Radiology (Diagnostic Imaging) Question: Is it appropriate to report 3D reconstruction separately when performed in conjunction with a computed tomographic angiography (CTA) or magnetic resonance angiography (MRA)? Answer: No, 3D reconstruction is inherent (included) in the CTA and MRA codes and not separately reported. Radiology: Diagnostic Radiology (Diagnostic Imaging) (Q&A) (March 2017). CPT® Assistant. 2017; March 2017 page 11 ...
Subscribe or sign in to view the full article.
Article Overview
This brief March 2017 CPT Assistant question-and-answer article addresses a diagnostic radiology coding topic related to 3D reconstruction in the context of angiography imaging. It is relevant to radiology coders, imaging departments, and billing professionals who work with computed tomographic angiography and magnetic resonance angiography services. The article provides general guidance on whether certain imaging components are reported separately or considered part of the primary study.
Why This Topic Matters
Radiology coding often depends on knowing when imaging components are separately reportable versus included in another service. This article helps readers understand the scope of reporting for a common advanced imaging situation.
What You Will Learn
- The article’s focus within diagnostic radiology coding and billing.
- How the Q&A format addresses reporting of imaging components in angiography studies.
- The general relationship between advanced angiography imaging services and associated reconstruction work.
- The type of CPT Assistant guidance presented in the March 2017 issue.
Who Should Read This
- Radiology coders
- Imaging department staff
- Medical billing professionals
- Revenue cycle specialists
- Compliance staff
Subscribe or sign in to view the full article.


Quick, Current, Complete - www.findacode.com