New Alternate Exclusions for 2016 Meaningful Use

Subscribe or sign in to view the full article.

Note:  The following article synopsis was NOT provided by BC Advantage. It was created by Find-A-Code/innoviHealth.

Article Overview

This article explains 2016 alternate exclusions tied to the Medicare and Medicaid Electronic Health Record Incentive Programs and the transition from Stage 1 to Modified Stage 2. It is aimed at clinicians, hospitals, and coding or compliance staff who need a high-level understanding of which meaningful use objectives and measures were affected and how the changes fit into attestation and reporting workflows.

Why This Topic Matters

Meaningful use exclusions can affect whether providers can successfully attest for a reporting period, especially when objectives, measures, or supporting technologies changed between stages. Understanding the scope of these 2016 alternate exclusions helps practices and hospitals assess relevance before attestation and avoid reporting surprises.

Article Sections

  1. Overview of 2016 alternate exclusions

    Summarizes the CMS final rule context and the purpose of the 2016 alternate exclusions. It also describes the transition issues related to EHR incentive program stages and certified EHR technology.

  2. Eligible Professionals

    Covers the objectives and measures discussed for eligible professionals and the general circumstances under which alternate exclusions may apply. The section focuses on the reporting categories addressed for 2016.

  3. Eligible Hospitals and Critical Access Hospitals

    Covers the objectives and measures discussed for eligible hospitals and critical access hospitals. It also summarizes the broader reporting areas addressed for 2016.

  4. iSALUS Healthcare mission statement

    Includes the closing organizational statement about the company’s products and mission. This section is promotional and not part of the coding guidance.

What You Will Learn

  • How 2016 alternate exclusions fit into the EHR Incentive Programs
  • Which broad meaningful use objectives are discussed for eligible professionals
  • Which broad meaningful use objectives are discussed for eligible hospitals and critical access hospitals
  • How the article frames attestation and reporting considerations for 2016
  • The role of CMS final rule changes in the 2016 exclusions discussion

Who Should Read This

  • Eligible professionals
  • Eligible hospitals
  • Critical access hospitals
  • Health information management staff
  • EHR implementation and compliance teams
  • Medical practice administrators

Subscribe or sign in to view the full article.

Access to this feature is available in the following products:
  • BC Advantage, 30+ CEUs & Webinars

demo
request yours today
subscribe
start today
newsletter
free subscription

Thank you for choosing Find-A-Code, please Sign In to remove ads.

Aimee- AI -powered coding assistant - Try it now for Free Would you like Aimee - AI
to help you with this?