decisionhealth Newsletters, Part B News - 1999 Issue 5 (May)
CPT panel keeps counting of physical exam elements, but you can add your own
Subscribe or sign in to view the full article.
Article Overview
This article reviews pending CPT evaluation and management documentation recommendations and the review process that follows. It explains the general direction of changes to physical exam documentation, broader concerns about alternative documentation methods, and related updates involving consultation and critical care language. It is relevant to physicians, coders, compliance staff, and practice managers tracking E/M guideline development and carrier review expectations.
Why This Topic Matters
Evaluation and management documentation rules affect how encounters are recorded and reviewed, so changes in CPT guidance can influence physician documentation practices, audit readiness, and payer interpretation. The article also highlights how guideline revisions may affect carrier review, pilot testing, and future adoption timelines.
Article Sections
-
Physical exam element counting and write-in elements
Discusses proposed documentation framework changes related to physical exam element counting and the possibility of adding clinician-selected elements. It also notes specialty input affecting certain examination categories.
-
Time as an alternative documentation basis
Covers a proposed approach involving time-based support for encounter documentation and the reasons it did not advance. It also summarizes support and concerns raised by professional groups.
-
Timeline, pilot testing, and physician community response
Summarizes the expected review pathway for the recommendations, including pilot testing and implementation timing. It also describes reactions from AMA leadership and the broader physician community.
-
Consultation and critical care language revisions
Notes additional CPT panel action involving consultation language and a separate revision related to critical care definitions. The section reflects other guideline refinements under consideration.
What You Will Learn
- How CPT E/M documentation guidance was being revised at the time
- What general types of physical exam documentation changes were under consideration
- Why time-based documentation support was debated
- How the guideline review and pilot-testing process was expected to proceed
- What other E/M language areas were being refined
Who Should Read This
- Physician coders
- Compliance professionals
- Practice managers
- Revenue cycle staff
- Medical billing specialists
- Healthcare consultants
Subscribe or sign in to view the full article.


Quick, Current, Complete - www.findacode.com