Discover eased reporting, navigate vendor issues for stage 2 MU

Why This Topic Matters

The article matters because it helps practices understand how the final 2015 CMS rule changed the reporting landscape and what operational steps may still be needed to stay on track for attestation. It is especially relevant for organizations relying on EHR workflows, dashboards, and public health reporting processes.

Article Sections

1. Meaningful use

   Introduces the 2015 final rule and the broader context for stage 2 reporting changes. Summarizes the general impact of the delayed release on providers preparing for attestation.

2. 3 changes make stage 2 reporting easier

   Describes the main stage 2 reporting areas affected by the final rule and the revised reporting period options. Focuses on how the updated framework changes overall reporting expectations for 2015 through 2017.

3. Make sure your dashboard is up to speed

   Addresses EHR vendor and dashboard readiness concerns that may affect reporting workflows. Explains why software updates and reporting displays may need review even when data collection continues.

4. Investigate your public health reporting needs

   Covers public health reporting as part of stage 2 and the need to identify appropriate agencies or registries. Discusses coordination issues that may arise when confirming eligible reporting pathways.

5. 2 more tips for public health reporting

   Provides additional operational considerations for completing public health reporting in time for the reporting period. Includes general sources organizations may consult when identifying reporting options.

6. Don’t miss the deadlines

   Summarizes the key attestation timing considerations for the reporting year. Notes the final submission window and the possibility of a deadline extension.