decisionhealth Newsletters, Part B News - 2016 Issue 11 (November)
Experts: Early MIPS payments will be low – but informed providers do better later
Subscribe or sign in to view the full article.
Article Overview
This article discusses early Quality Payment Program implementation and the transition to MIPS, with emphasis on quality reporting, feedback reports, benchmarking, reporting timeframes, and the structure of potential payment adjustments. It is aimed at providers, practice administrators, coders, and consultants who need to understand how the new program’s measurement framework may affect reporting strategy and future reimbursement. The article covers general guidance from CMS and industry experts on how to interpret performance data and prepare for evolving participation requirements.
Why This Topic Matters
Early MIPS performance can affect whether a practice avoids penalties and how much it may earn in future adjustments. Understanding the reporting framework, benchmarks, and payment structure helps organizations prepare for broader all-payer quality reporting expectations.
Article Sections
-
Quality Payment Program and MIPS overview
Introduces the transition from the prior quality reporting environment to the new program and explains the article’s focus on early participation and payment impact.
-
Reporting data beyond Medicare
Discusses preparation for broader patient reporting and the role of vendors, registries, and electronic health record systems in supporting the new requirements.
-
Using quality reports and benchmarks
Reviews the value of feedback reports and national benchmark information for comparing performance and identifying opportunities to improve.
-
Reporting across the year
Covers the timing of submission, the effect of shorter versus longer reporting periods, and how reporting duration may influence performance assessment.
-
What your hard work will get you
Summarizes the early-year threshold concept, the general structure of payment adjustments, and the uncertainty surrounding final bonus amounts.
-
4% might not add up
Explains budget neutrality and why maximum positive adjustments may be lower than advertised in the transitional period.
-
$500 million doesn’t go far
Describes the separate incentive pool for higher performers and the broad framework for how top-tier adjustments are determined.
What You Will Learn
- How the article frames early Quality Payment Program participation
- Why non-Medicare reporting is becoming important
- How feedback reports and benchmarks can guide performance review
- How reporting duration may affect measurement results
- How the article describes MIPS payment adjustment structure
- Why higher-performance incentive amounts may differ from headline figures
Who Should Read This
- Physicians and eligible clinicians
- Practice administrators
- Medical coders and billing staff
- Quality reporting professionals
- Healthcare consultants
- EHR and registry vendors
Subscribe or sign in to view the full article.



Quick, Current, Complete - www.findacode.com