decisionhealth Newsletters, Part B News - 2014 Issue 4 (April)
Guest column: Delay doesn’t mean to put off ICD-10 preparedness for the future
Subscribe or sign in to view the full article.
Article Overview
This guest column explains why a delay in ICD-10 implementation does not eliminate the need for preparation. It covers the policy context behind the delay, the role of CMS and Congress, and general readiness efforts such as documentation improvement, training, system upgrades, testing, and vendor readiness. The article is aimed at practice managers, coders, compliance staff, and other healthcare operations leaders trying to plan for ICD-10.
Why This Topic Matters
ICD-10 readiness affects documentation, coding workflow, billing operations, and system coordination across practices and vendors. The article helps readers understand why postponement still requires ongoing preparation and planning.
Article Sections
-
ICD-10 delay and implementation outlook
This section discusses the delay in ICD-10 implementation and the broader expectation that the transition will still occur. It also references the policy and regulatory context surrounding the postponement.
-
Preparing for ICD-10 now makes sense
This section focuses on general preparedness efforts for ICD-10, including documentation improvement, training, system updates, and operational planning. It also touches on the impact of vendor readiness and workflow constraints.
What You Will Learn
- Why an ICD-10 delay does not end the need for preparedness
- What kinds of operational areas are affected by ICD-10 readiness
- How documentation, systems, and vendor issues can influence transition planning
- Which stakeholder groups are involved in ICD-10 preparation
Who Should Read This
- Practice managers
- Medical coders
- Compliance officers
- Revenue cycle staff
- Healthcare operations leaders
- Physician group administrators
Subscribe or sign in to view the full article.


Quick, Current, Complete - www.findacode.com