decisionhealth Newsletters, Coder Pink Sheets - 2008 Issue 10 (October)
History-taking 101: Documenting E/Ms for the urology practice
Subscribe or sign in to view the full article.
Article Overview
This article is a practical overview for urology coders, billers, and clinical documentation staff on documenting the history portion of evaluation and management services. It covers the major history elements used in E/M documentation, how those elements are commonly captured in practice, and why complete documentation matters for selecting the appropriate service level. The discussion is framed around general documentation guidance and the history component of office and hospital-based E/M visits.
Why This Topic Matters
Accurate history documentation affects E/M level selection and supports compliant billing in urology practices and other outpatient or inpatient settings.
Article Sections
-
Four categories of history reviewed
Introduces the major history components used in E/M documentation and explains how they fit together in the visit record.
-
Chief Complaint (CC)
Discusses the purpose of the chief complaint and how it is generally reflected in the medical record.
-
History of Present Illness (HPI)
Reviews the role of the HPI and the broad types of details used to characterize the presenting problem.
-
Review of Systems (ROS)
Covers the review of systems as part of history taking and describes its relationship to documentation completeness.
-
Past, Family and Social History (PFSH)
Summarizes the place of past, family, and social history in building the overall clinical picture.
-
Select problem-focused, expanded, detailed or comprehensive
Explains how the collected history information is organized into standard documentation levels for E/M assessment.
What You Will Learn
- How the main components of history are organized for E/M documentation
- What broad types of information are gathered during a review of systems
- How past, family, and social history contributes to the overall chart note
- How history documentation relates to selecting an E/M service level
- What documentation considerations apply when a complete history cannot be obtained
Who Should Read This
- Urology coders
- Medical billers
- Clinical documentation staff
- Physicians and advanced practice providers
- Practice managers
Codes Discussed
Code Ranges Discussed
Subscribe or sign in to view the full article.


Quick, Current, Complete - www.findacode.com