decisionhealth Newsletters, Part B News - 2011 Issue 1 (January)
When and when not to use new subsequent observation codes
Subscribe or sign in to view the full article.
Article Overview
This article explains how different payer and code-authority guidance can affect billing for observation care when a patient is seen by more than one physician or seen again after an initial observation encounter. It is aimed at coders, billing staff, and clinicians who need to understand how CMS, CPT, and a private payer may approach the same observation-care situations differently. The discussion focuses on the general categories of observation and E/M guidance involved, without replacing the premium article’s detailed comparison.
Why This Topic Matters
Observation billing can vary depending on the payer and the physician’s role in the patient’s care. Understanding where CMS, CPT, and private payer guidance align or differ helps reduce claim errors and supports more consistent coding decisions.
What You Will Learn
- How observation-care billing may differ among CMS, CPT, and private payers.
- How physician role and encounter sequence can affect which general category of service is discussed.
- Why payer-specific policy matters in observation-related E/M coding.
- How to compare broad billing guidance across different authorities.
Who Should Read This
- Medical coders
- Billing specialists
- Revenue cycle staff
- Physicians
- Compliance teams
Codes Discussed
Code Ranges Discussed
Subscribe or sign in to view the full article.


Quick, Current, Complete - www.findacode.com