OIG Work Plan: What did the OIG work on and what did they find?

January 9th, 2018

Subscribe or sign in to view the full article.

Note:  The following article synopsis was NOT provided by HCPro. It was created by Find-A-Code/innoviHealth.

Article Overview

This article examines an Office of the Inspector General audit topic involving diagnosis coding compliance, with emphasis on how coding conventions, official guidance, and manual structure can affect audit findings. It is written for coders, CDI professionals, auditors, and compliance staff who need to understand how oversight findings connect to ICD coding practices and documentation support.

Why This Topic Matters

It highlights how coding guidance, classification structure, and audit scrutiny can intersect to create compliance exposure when documentation, source authorities, and code assignment do not align. The article is relevant to organizations monitoring OIG focus areas and to coding teams seeking to reduce audit risk.

Article Sections

  1. Audit findings

    Summarizes a specific OIG-related audit topic and the general compliance concerns associated with diagnosis coding review. It also situates the discussion within broader reimbursement and documentation scrutiny.

  2. Coding guidance

    Discusses general coding convention issues, source authority reliance, and how coding guidance and classification structure can affect code assignment. The section also references broader concerns about consistency in coding resources and audit interpretation.

  3. Aftermath

    Reviews the general consequences following the audit findings and discusses compliance implications for providers and coders. It closes with broad observations about source guidance, documentation support, and the potential impact of changes to classification references.

What You Will Learn

  • How an OIG work plan topic can intersect with diagnosis coding compliance
  • Why coding source authorities and conventions matter in audit settings
  • How classification structure and documentation support can influence audit risk
  • What broader compliance issues can arise when coding guidance appears inconsistent

Who Should Read This

  • Medical coders
  • Coding auditors
  • CDI specialists
  • Compliance officers
  • Health information management professionals
  • Revenue cycle teams

Codes Discussed

  • ICD-9-CM: 260
  • ICD-10-CM: E41
  • ICD-10-CM: R64

Modifiers Discussed

  • ICD-9-CM: non-essential modifiers
  • ICD-10-CM: non-essential modifiers

Subscribe or sign in to view the full article.

Access to this feature is available in the following products:
  • HCPro's JustCoding Newsletters +Archives

The JustCoding® Newsletter is a fantastic resource for coding professionals. Whether you're an inpatient or outpatient coder, a veteran or new to the job, JustCoding will keep your skills sharp and help you stay abreast of CMS changes.


demo
request yours today
subscribe
start today
newsletter
free subscription

Thank you for choosing Find-A-Code, please Sign In to remove ads.

Aimee- AI -powered coding assistant - Try it now for Free Would you like Aimee - AI
to help you with this?