ED Coding & Reimbursement Alert - 2009 Issue 15
CPT 2010: Here's the Lowdown on 2010 Consultation Changes
Subscribe or sign in to view the full article.
Article Overview
This article covers the 2010 changes to consultation coding under Medicare and the broader impact on payer behavior, reimbursement, and evaluation and management coding workflow. It is aimed at coders, billing staff, and clinicians who report E/M services and need to understand how consultation services are treated across office and hospital settings. The discussion addresses code-category changes, payer variability, and high-level guidance for identifying alternative E/M service categories when consultation reporting is no longer accepted.
Why This Topic Matters
The article is relevant because payer policy changes can affect which E/M services are reportable and how those services are reimbursed in 2010. It helps coding professionals understand where consultation reporting may still be recognized and where other E/M categories are being used instead.
Article Sections
-
Codes Remain — But When Can You Use Them?
Introduces the 2010 consultation-code policy shift and discusses the difference between Medicare treatment of consultation services and the CPT manual’s continued inclusion of the codes. Also notes the effect on reimbursement and payer adoption trends.
-
Watch other payers
Describes how commercial payer policies may differ and why coding staff need to confirm each payer’s approach. Includes broad discussion of uniformity efforts and the need to map consultation services to other E/M categories when required.
-
Apply Patient Status Rules to Outpatient Encounters
Covers the general move from consultation reporting to standard E/M coding for outpatient encounters and how patient status concepts become important. Includes an example involving an office encounter and documentation considerations.
-
Look at Time When Choosing Inpatient Code
Discusses hospital-based coding issues when consultation services are evaluated against other inpatient E/M categories. Highlights the different reimbursement impact across service levels and the need to match services carefully.
-
Don't miss mismatch
Addresses differences between consultation and hospital care coding at lower service levels and the potential for non-equivalent crosswalks. Notes that additional guidance may be needed where service requirements do not align cleanly.
-
Consider using time to line up the services
Mentions the use of crosswalk concepts as a general guide and cautions against treating them as official coding instructions. Focuses on aligning services conceptually rather than reproducing exact payer logic.
What You Will Learn
- How the 2010 consultation policy change affects E/M reporting
- Why Medicare and private payer approaches may differ
- How outpatient and inpatient E/M categories factor into post-consult coding
- What broad reimbursement considerations arise from the policy shift
- How crosswalk-style comparisons are used at a high level in this context
Who Should Read This
- Medical coders
- Billing staff
- Compliance professionals
- Physicians
- Practice managers
Codes Discussed
Code Ranges Discussed
Subscribe or sign in to view the full article.


Quick, Current, Complete - www.findacode.com