General Surgery Coding Alert - 2016 Issue 6
MACRA APM News: Participating In A Qualified APM Could Exempt You From MIPS Participation
Subscribe or sign in to view the full article.
Article Overview
This article explains proposed MACRA guidance on alternative payment models, including the distinction between qualified APM participation and advanced APM status, along with how those pathways relate to MIPS reporting. It also covers CMS commentary on bundled payment models, participation thresholds tied to payments and patients, and a proposed shift in quality reporting policy that may affect modifier use and measure availability. The content is aimed at clinicians, billing and coding professionals, and practices following Medicare quality reporting and value-based payment updates.
Why This Topic Matters
The article helps readers understand which Medicare payment arrangements may change reporting obligations and potential incentive eligibility under MACRA. It is especially relevant for organizations tracking CMS quality programs, alternative payment models, and reporting changes that can affect compliance and workflow.
Article Sections
-
Qualified APM participation and MIPS implications
Introduces the relationship between qualified alternative payment model participation and the broader Medicare quality reporting framework. Discusses how the article frames participation status, reporting obligations, and incentive considerations.
-
Not all bundled payment models are considered APMs under MACRA
Summarizes CMS’s approach to bundled payment model eligibility for APM treatment. References several example programs and explains the article’s focus on which model types are included in the discussion.
-
What is an Advanced APM under MACRA?
Outlines the proposed criteria used to distinguish advanced alternative payment models. Focuses on the general policy requirements described in the article and how they relate to Medicare participation standards.
-
Track both percentage of payments and percentage of patients
Covers the article’s discussion of participation thresholds tied to payments and patient counts over time. Presents the broad concept of how these thresholds are used in the proposed framework.
-
The 8P Modifier May be Less Available in 2017
Reviews CMS’s stated direction toward performance-based reporting and the potential impact on modifier use. Also touches on the article’s discussion of quality measure changes and broader reporting shifts.
What You Will Learn
- How MACRA distinguishes between qualified APM participation and broader MIPS reporting requirements
- Which kinds of Medicare payment models are discussed as examples of APMs
- What broad criteria are described for advanced APM status
- How participation thresholds are discussed in relation to payments and patients
- Why CMS’s reporting changes may affect quality measure selection and modifier use
Who Should Read This
- Physicians and clinicians participating in Medicare programs
- Medical practice administrators
- Coding and reimbursement professionals
- Compliance and quality reporting staff
- Healthcare organizations evaluating value-based payment models
Codes Discussed
Modifiers Discussed
Subscribe or sign in to view the full article.


Quick, Current, Complete - www.findacode.com