General Surgery Coding Alert - 2016 Issue 6
MACRA Proposed Rule: MACRA, MIPS and APMs: The Proposed Rule Offers A Peek Into Future Reporting Requirements
Subscribe or sign in to view the full article.
Article Overview
This article reviews CMS’s MACRA proposed rule and its impact on physician quality reporting, payment adjustment, and future Medicare performance measurement. It is aimed at clinicians, coding and billing staff, practice administrators, and compliance teams who need a high-level understanding of the proposed MIPS structure, reporting categories, scoring approach, and related program changes. The discussion covers the major program areas being renamed or consolidated, the types of measures and activities CMS proposes to use, and the implications for group and individual reporting.
Why This Topic Matters
The proposed rule signals major changes to how Medicare performance will be reported and scored, so practices need to understand the new framework to prepare for future reporting obligations and payment impacts.
Article Sections
-
Introduction and CMS proposal overview
Introduces the CMS MACRA proposed rule and its broad significance for future Medicare reporting and payments. It also frames the article’s focus on changes to familiar quality programs.
-
Look for familiar programs with new names in 2017
Summarizes the proposed consolidation of existing reporting programs into a single performance framework. It outlines the four main performance categories and the general structure of the new scoring approach.
-
Quality
Covers the quality performance category and how it relates to earlier reporting structures. It discusses general reporting expectations, measure types, thresholds, and registry or claims-based submission approaches.
-
Advancing Clinical Information (ACI)
Describes the clinical information category that replaces the earlier electronic reporting incentive framework. It also notes how certain provider settings may be treated under the proposal.
-
Cost or resource use
Explains the proposed cost-based performance category and the general kinds of measures CMS says may be used. It also notes the category’s broader role in the overall score over time.
-
Clinical practice improvement activities (CPIA)
Reviews the proposed improvement activities category and the broad types of activities included. It presents the organization of the activity categories without detailing any coding or scoring specifics.
-
Group and provider are now both utilized for MIPS scoring
Describes how scoring may apply at the individual, group, and tax identification number levels. It also discusses submission flexibility and how performance data may be aggregated.
-
What does this mean for future year incentives?
Summarizes the article’s discussion of future performance thresholds and potential payment impacts. It also notes the inclusion of additional clinician types in the program.
What You Will Learn
- How CMS proposed to reorganize physician reporting programs under MACRA
- What the major MIPS performance categories are at a high level
- How the proposed rule affects quality, clinical information, cost, and improvement activities
- What types of entities and reporting methods are discussed in the proposal
- How group and individual performance scoring are addressed in the article
- Why the proposed changes matter for future Medicare payment adjustments
Who Should Read This
- Physicians
- Emergency department clinicians
- Medical coders
- Billing staff
- Practice administrators
- Compliance teams
- Revenue cycle professionals
Codes Discussed
Subscribe or sign in to view the full article.


Quick, Current, Complete - www.findacode.com