Medicare Compliance & Reimbursement - 2007 Issue 8
PART B MYTH BUSTER: 'Bounty Hunters' May Be Scrutinizing Your Inpatient E/M Visits
Subscribe or sign in to view the full article.
Article Overview
This premium article discusses a billing myth related to inpatient evaluation and management services under Medicare Part B. It focuses on the distinction between an office encounter and an inpatient encounter, the documentation expected for initial hospital visits, and why Recovery Audit Contractors may review these claims closely. The piece is aimed at coders, billers, compliance staff, and physician practices that handle hospital admission-related E/M reporting.
Why This Topic Matters
Misunderstanding where an E/M service occurred can lead to incorrect claim submission, documentation problems, and audit exposure. The article helps readers recognize why hospital-based records, physician schedules, and place-of-service details are important when reviewing inpatient visit billing.
What You Will Learn
- How inpatient E/M billing differs from office-based encounters
- Why documentation location and place of service are important
- What types of claims may attract audit review
- How coding staff may validate whether an inpatient visit actually occurred in the hospital
Who Should Read This
- Medical coders
- Billing staff
- Compliance professionals
- Physician practices
- Hospital revenue cycle teams
Codes Discussed
Code Ranges Discussed
Subscribe or sign in to view the full article.
Quick, Current, Complete - www.findacode.com