Anthem's blending: Controversial policy gives one fee for 99213 or 99214

Subscribe or sign in to view the full article.

Note:  The following article synopsis was NOT provided by HCPro. It was created by Find-A-Code/innoviHealth.

Article Overview

This article examines a payer policy change that affected reimbursement for common office visit evaluation and management services and triggered controversy among pediatric practices. It summarizes viewpoints from physicians, coders, and professional associations, and it also notes the payer’s stated rationale and responses from other insurers. The piece is relevant to pediatric billing staff, coders, practice managers, and physicians who follow E/M reimbursement policy developments.

Why This Topic Matters

The article helps readers understand a reimbursement policy issue that can affect practice revenue, documentation incentives, and payer-provider relations in primary care and pediatrics.

Article Sections

  1. Policy change and provider reaction

    Introduces the reimbursement policy change and outlines concerns raised by pediatric practices and coding staff about its impact on E/M billing and documentation.

  2. AAP and coder perspectives

    Summarizes comments from physician leaders and coding professionals regarding the policy, documentation expectations, and broader implications for office visit coding.

  3. Anthem claims blended rate has meant more money for docs

    Presents the payer’s explanation for the policy, including its stated administrative purpose and general reimbursement effect in the affected region.

  4. Other Insurers Fail to Comment

    Notes the responses, or lack of response, from other insurers and mentions how their approaches compare at a high level.

  5. Ongoing dispute and next steps

    Describes continued opposition from pediatricians and references possible future changes or review of the policy.

What You Will Learn

  • How a payer reimbursement change can affect common office visit E/M services
  • Why pediatric practices and coders viewed the policy as controversial
  • What different stakeholders said about the policy’s effects on documentation, revenue, and administration
  • How other insurers’ approaches were discussed in relation to the issue

Who Should Read This

  • Professional medical coders
  • Pediatric practice managers
  • Physicians
  • Billing and reimbursement staff
  • Healthcare compliance and revenue cycle professionals

Codes Discussed


Subscribe or sign in to view the full article.

Official DecisionHealth® Newsletter Archives includes:

  • Includes over 25,000 articles from:
    • Coder Pink Sheets
    • Part B News
    • Answer Books newsletters
  • Current newsletters added each quarter
  • Timely news and guidance vital for your practice
  • Fully searchable through Find-A-Code's Comprehensive Search
  • Codes mentioned in articles are linked to the Find-A-Code Code Information pages
  • Code Information pages link back to related articles
  • Save yourself tons of research time, find everything in one place!
Access to this feature is available in the following products:
  • DecisionHealth Coding, Billing and Compliance Library

Related Articles

Articles are listed in order of calculated relevance.

demo
request yours today
subscribe
start today
newsletter
free subscription

Thank you for choosing Find-A-Code, please Sign In to remove ads.

Aimee- AI -powered coding assistant - Try it now for Free Would you like Aimee - AI
to help you with this?