decisionhealth Newsletters, Part B News - 2002 Issue 4 (April)
E/M guidelines are biggest burden, commenters tell advisory body
Subscribe or sign in to view the full article.
Article Overview
This article summarizes public feedback gathered by an HHS advisory committee examining Medicare regulatory reform. It highlights the types of rules practices find most burdensome, especially documentation requirements for evaluation and management services, and also discusses other frequently cited compliance issues such as beneficiary notices, medical review, EMTALA-related concerns, and local medical review policies. The piece is relevant to physicians, practice managers, compliance staff, and others tracking Medicare administrative requirements and reform efforts.
Why This Topic Matters
It helps readers understand which Medicare rules providers are most frustrated with and why a federal advisory process was created to identify simplification opportunities.
What You Will Learn
- Which Medicare administrative requirements commenters found most burdensome
- What broad concerns practices raised about documentation and review processes
- How public comments were being collected and reviewed by an HHS advisory committee
- Which other regulatory topics were repeatedly mentioned in the feedback
Who Should Read This
- Physicians
- Practice managers
- Medical billing and coding professionals
- Compliance staff
- Healthcare administrators
Modifiers Discussed
Subscribe or sign in to view the full article.


Quick, Current, Complete - www.findacode.com