decisionhealth Newsletters, Coder Pink Sheets - 2020 Issue 7 (July)
E/M update: Navigate new vs. established patient distinctions during COVID-19
Subscribe or sign in to view the full article.
Article Overview
This article reviews how Medicare/CMS guidance during the COVID-19 public health emergency affected the treatment of new and established patient status for certain evaluation and management services. It is aimed at coding, billing, and compliance staff who need a plain-language overview of the temporary telehealth flexibility, the service categories implicated, and the documentation and audit considerations discussed by CMS.
Why This Topic Matters
Accurate patient-status reporting can affect claim handling, internal review processes, and revenue integrity during and after temporary public health emergency policies. The article helps readers understand the scope of the telehealth-related flexibilities and the broader compliance context in which they applied.
Article Sections
-
COVID-19 public health emergency context
Introduces the temporary policy environment and the article’s focus on new versus established patient status. It frames the issue in relation to CMS guidance during the public health emergency.
-
CMS definition of a new patient
Summarizes the Medicare framework used to distinguish patient status under CMS policy. It cites the source manual referenced in the article.
-
Telehealth flexibility for established-patient services
Describes how temporary enforcement discretion affected selected virtual evaluation and management services. It also notes the operational implications for practices using those services during the emergency period.
-
Examples of established-patient specific codes
Lists several service types discussed by the article as examples tied to established-patient language. The section is presented as part of the article’s telehealth coding discussion.
-
Internal tracking and audit considerations
Covers the article’s compliance-oriented discussion of using internal claim flags and preparing for later review. It emphasizes operational recordkeeping rather than coding detail.
-
New vs. established matters for telehealth
Explains the article’s broader telehealth context for services with separate new and established patient categories. It connects patient status to reporting and reimbursement considerations.
-
Telehealth service categories during the PHE
Summarizes the service groups discussed as affected by temporary telehealth policy changes. It also notes the article’s discussion of differing availability by setting and patient type.
-
Expiration of temporary telehealth coverage
Notes the article’s discussion of how temporary coverage changes were tied to the public health emergency timeline. It includes the general transition back to normal telehealth requirements.
-
Resource
Provides the referenced CMS manual resource mentioned at the end of the article.
What You Will Learn
- How CMS distinguished new and established patients during the public health emergency
- Which telehealth service categories were discussed in connection with temporary policy flexibility
- Why patient status still mattered for claims, internal review, and compliance workflows
- How the article frames the end of temporary public health emergency telehealth changes
Who Should Read This
- Medical coders
- Billing staff
- Compliance teams
- Revenue cycle professionals
- Telehealth administrators
Codes Discussed
Code Ranges Discussed
Subscribe or sign in to view the full article.


Quick, Current, Complete - www.findacode.com