decisionhealth Newsletters, Part B News - 2000 Issue 6 (June)
Side by side comparison of E/M documentation guidelines
Subscribe or sign in to view the full article.
Article Overview
This article presents a side-by-side overview of evaluation and management documentation guidelines, comparing earlier guideline requirements with later draft guidance. It is intended for coding and compliance readers who want a high-level view of how documentation components were organized and refined, including history, review of systems, past/family/social history, physical examination, and medical decision making. The article is useful for understanding the scope and structure of guideline changes without serving as a standalone coding reference.
Why This Topic Matters
Documentation guidance for E/M services affects how encounters are recorded and reviewed. A side-by-side comparison helps coders, auditors, and clinicians understand the evolution of documentation expectations and recognize which areas were emphasized in different guideline versions.
Article Sections
-
Code Component
Introduces the documentation components being compared across different guideline versions.
-
History (HPI) of Present Illness
Summarizes how history-related documentation expectations are presented across the compared guideline sets.
-
Review of Systems (ROS)
Compares the review-of-systems portion of the documentation guidance across versions.
-
Past, Family, Social History (PFSH)
Shows how past, family, and social history documentation is addressed in the comparison.
-
Physical Exam
Outlines the physical examination component as it appears in the different guideline frameworks.
-
Medical Decision Making
Compares the medical decision-making component across the referenced guideline versions.
What You Will Learn
- How the major E/M documentation components are organized in a side-by-side comparison
- Which parts of the documentation framework are highlighted for history, exam, and decision making
- How the article frames changes between earlier guidelines and draft guidance
- What broad documentation themes are emphasized for coding and compliance review
Who Should Read This
- Medical coders
- Coding auditors
- Compliance professionals
- Physicians and clinical documentation staff
- Revenue cycle staff
Subscribe or sign in to view the full article.


Quick, Current, Complete - www.findacode.com