decisionhealth Newsletters, Part B News - 2015 Issue 4 (April)
Determine whether provider did expanded problem-focused or detailed exam
Subscribe or sign in to view the full article.
Article Overview
This article discusses evaluation and management (E/M) examination level selection, focusing on how providers, coders, and auditors distinguish expanded problem-focused from detailed exams. It compares the 1995 and 1997 documentation guidance at a high level, notes how audit tools and carrier policies may influence review, and identifies why the distinction matters for office visit code selection and auditing. The piece is aimed at coders, billers, auditors, and compliance staff who work with E/M documentation.
Why This Topic Matters
Choosing the correct exam level can affect E/M code selection, claim value, and audit outcomes. The article highlights why this judgment remains subjective and why documentation review often depends on guideline interpretation and payer-specific policies.
Article Sections
-
Coding
Introduces the topic and frames the discussion around evaluation and management documentation guidance.
-
Coders’ rules of thumb
Summarizes common audit and documentation approaches used to distinguish exam levels, including references to guideline structure and common counting methods.
-
One carrier makes its own rules
Describes a Medicare administrative contractor policy example and how local review practices may differ from general guidance.
What You Will Learn
- How E/M exam levels are compared across documentation guideline frameworks
- What broad factors auditors consider when reviewing examination detail
- How payer-specific review policies can affect exam-level interpretation
- Why the exam-level distinction matters for coding and auditing
Who Should Read This
- Medical coders
- Medical billers
- Compliance staff
- Auditors
- Practice managers
Codes Discussed
Subscribe or sign in to view the full article.


Quick, Current, Complete - www.findacode.com