AMA CPT® Assistant - 2004 Issue 6 (June)
Eye and Ocular Adnexa (June 2004)
June 2004 page 10b Coding Consultation:Questions and Answers Eye and Ocular Adnexa, 67227, 67039 (Q&A) Question If a patient with proliferative diabetic retinopathy undergoes treatment involving a pars plana vitrectomy as well as cryopexy destruction to treat the diabetic retinopathy, should code 67227 be reported or should two codes be assigned to describe the vitrectomy and cryopexy procedures? AMA Comment Two CPT codes should be reported to describe the differing surgical techniques performed in different posterior segment anatomy (ie, vitreous and retinal blood vessels). CPT code 67227, Destruction of extensive or progressive retinopathy (eg, diabetic retinopathy), one or...
Subscribe or sign in to view the full article.
Article Overview
This article presents a question-and-answer coding consultation for eye and ocular adnexa services. It is aimed at medical coders, billers, and ophthalmology practices seeking general guidance on CPT reporting for a June 2004 case discussion involving posterior segment procedures and modifier usage. The content centers on how the scenario is addressed in the source commentary and highlights the coding concepts discussed without reproducing the full premium guidance.
Why This Topic Matters
Ophthalmology coding can involve multiple procedures performed in distinct anatomic areas during the same encounter. This article is useful because it explains the type of CPT guidance discussed for a June 2004 eye and ocular adnexa scenario and helps readers determine whether the full consultation is relevant to their coding question.
Article Sections
-
Coding Consultation: Questions and Answers
Introduces a coding consultation format focused on an eye and ocular adnexa scenario. The section frames a specific reporting question and the associated commentary.
-
Question
Presents the clinical/coding scenario that prompted the consultation. The question concerns a posterior segment treatment situation and whether reporting should be handled with one or more CPT codes.
-
AMA Comment
Provides the source commentary discussing CPT reporting for the described scenario. The section also mentions a multiple procedure modifier in the context of the consultation.
What You Will Learn
- The general topic of the coding consultation and the ophthalmology setting involved.
- How the article frames a reporting question for a combined eye procedure scenario.
- Which types of CPT guidance are discussed in the AMA commentary, including modifier-related context.
- The publication timing and article context within a June 2004 CPT Assistant issue.
Who Should Read This
- Medical coders
- Coding auditors
- Ophthalmology practice staff
- Billing professionals
- Compliance teams
Codes Discussed
Modifiers Discussed
Subscribe or sign in to view the full article.


Quick, Current, Complete - www.findacode.com