E/M Coding Alert - 2013 Issue 39
Part B Coding Coach: Navigate the New-Versus-Established-Patient Maze With Expert Tips
Subscribe or sign in to view the full article.
Article Overview
This educational coding article reviews the framework used to determine whether a patient is new or established for E/M reporting and how that status affects selection of service levels in several common care settings. It is aimed at coders, billers, and clinicians who work with outpatient, inpatient, consultation, and hospital-based E/M documentation. The article also covers general guidance tied to CPT and Medicare policy, including key-component requirements, specialty considerations, and the relationship between documentation and medical necessity.
Why This Topic Matters
Correctly identifying patient status and the applicable E/M framework is essential for accurate reporting, compliance, and avoiding inappropriate level selection across multiple settings.
Article Sections
-
3 Year Rule Determines Patient Status
Explains the general framework used to determine whether a patient is treated as new or established based on prior encounters within a practice. The section also addresses the role of practice structure and encounter type.
-
Exceptions Could Occur for Different Specialties
Covers situations in multi-specialty practices where encounters with different specialties may affect patient status for E/M reporting. The section focuses on broad specialty-based distinctions.
-
Consult Codes Don’t Differentiate
Discusses consultation coding in relation to new and established patient status and summarizes the general documentation framework used for those services. It also references CPT ranges and related service categories.
-
2 of 3 Will Do for Most Established E/M Visits
Reviews the general documentation framework for established patient E/M services and how service levels are determined across common outpatient and facility settings. The section includes broader discussion of related CPT service categories.
-
Watch for Overcoding
Addresses the relationship between documentation, medical necessity, and E/M level selection. It also notes alternative time-based reporting concepts at a general level.
What You Will Learn
- How patient status is generally determined for E/M reporting
- How encounter type and practice structure can affect whether a patient is new or established
- How specialty distinctions may matter in multi-specialty practices
- How consultation services are discussed in relation to patient status
- How documentation requirements differ across common E/M service categories
- How medical necessity relates to E/M level selection
- How time-based reporting is mentioned as an alternative framework
Who Should Read This
- Medical coders
- Billing staff
- Compliance professionals
- Physicians and other clinicians
- Practice managers
Codes Discussed
Code Ranges Discussed
Subscribe or sign in to view the full article.


Quick, Current, Complete - www.findacode.com